Experienced Trial Attorneys and Civil Litigators Representing both Plaintiffs and Defendants
Our Attorneys are Here to Help
We strive to make sure every client is provided excellent service through aggressive representation based on honesty and integrity. We’re here to help.
DK Law Group attorneys practice the trial and mediation of virtually all civil matters representing both plaintiffs and defendants. We specialize in business law and litigation, contract disputes, personal injury and accidents, consumer protection cases, employment, real estate, construction, professional negligence, and insurance-related litigation. Firm founder David Karen has successfully taken numerous cases to jury trial and has been advising his clients and resolving their legal disputes for over 35 years. Mr. Karen’s law practice includes both the defense and prosecution of all aspects of civil litigation of serious personal injury and business interests, including arbitration, mediation, aggressive discovery, litigation review, litigation management, and all forms of dispute resolution.
If you are seeking legal counsel in regard to any California civil matter, receive a Free Consultation:
Testimonials
- From its experience with the local legal community, the court is aware that Mr. Karen is experienced and competent both as a litigator and as a mediator. He was very suited to Mr. [X’s] needs to sue his former lawyers and to reach a negotiated settlement of the case to raise badly needed cash.
- We wanted to thank you again for your efforts. The simple fact is that without you it is unlikely this case would have been settled. We no longer wake up with the specter of a trial looming over our heads…We appreciate beyond measure your efforts on our behalf.
- It was a pleasure having you be able to assist in bringing about a successful conclusion given the dynamics you faced in the other room. Your professionalism and dedication was most appreciated. I will certainly keep you at the top of my list for future mediations. Thanks again. Take care.
- I find the law firm to be honest and hardworking in the cases that it handles. I would highly recommend this law firm to anyone who is considering a lawsuit that covers these matters.
- David was very adept & persistent. He continued to assist the parties in reaching a settlement beyond the initial mediation.
- David, you did an excellent job. I was very impressed. Thanks again.
- Mr. Karen acted professionally, exhibited intelligence, and an understanding of the advantages of being courteous to the opposition while strongly supporting his client with regards to facts and the law.
- Business Law & Litigation – Plaintiff and Defense Representation
- Breach of Contract / Contract Disputes
- Partnership and Shareholder Disputes
- Insurance Claims
- Covenants Not to Compete
- Commercial Litigation
- Construction and Real Estate Litigation
- Franchise Disputes
- Trade Secret Claims / IP Litigation
- Business Fraud
- Unfair Competition
- Intentional Interference Claims
- Negotiation Representation
- Media and Public Relations – Spokesperson Representation
- Serious Personal Injury
- Negligence Claims
- Dog Bites
- Automobile Accidents
- Premises Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Unfair Competition
- Wrongful Termination
- Construction Defect Law
- Insurance Law & Claims
- Mediation and Arbitration
- Professional & Medical Malpractice Litigation
- Real Estate Law
- Regulatory Compliance
- Products Liability
- Timeshare Law
Summer Internship Class of 2020
Delaney Moss I am sixteen years old and a junior at Santa Susana High School. My first exposure to mock trial was in the sixth grade, and I have been fascinated by the legal system ever since. I have competed in seven mock trial competitions at the county and international level, and I coached a
Continue ReadingECT Shock Treatment Litigation – Update April 2020
We are pleased to report that on April 7, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the lower court’s dismissal of the claims of the victims of ECT treatment and reinstated the action. The trial court previously held that the statute of limitations began to run for these claimants at the precise moment of
Continue Reading
